Sound Counsel: How Lawyers Handle Legal Ethics and Podcasting

By Jared Correia

You need a game plan before entering the sometimes terrifying world of law firm podcasting. But that’s no reason to stay away. Let’s walk through the big questions about legal ethics and podcasting, and allay some of your fears.

A glowing microphone surrounded by flames, illustrating the hot topic of legal ethics and podcasting.

Like the proverbial turd in the proverbial punch bowl, professional ethics for lawyers is always lurking, just out of frame, to ruin the fun. In fact, it’s one reason lawyers are reticent to market their practices, since they’re afraid to say, state, or write the wrong thing and face real ramifications for their professional licensure.

Hosting a podcast is a great way for a lawyer to build reputation and authority, but podcasts may appear to be the scariest medium — I mean, after all, you’re recording live conversations.

Now, if you’re reading this, you’re probably an attorney. And, if you’re an attorney, you’re amazing at spotting potential downsides to every endeavor. Thus, if you’re considering a podcast as a marketing option, you may be stopped in your tracks like one of Dr. Seuss’s Zax by these ethical quandaries, believing that navigating legal ethics and podcasting is simply not worth the squeeze.

So, let’s lay out some of the potential professional ethics issues surrounding podcasts and potentially allay your fear; because it’s OK to pinpoint problems, so long as you’re not engaged in unnecessarily building up mountains from mole hills.

The two anchor concerns for legal ethics, as those are applied to legal marketing, respect the inadvertent creation of attorney-client relationships and the related concern of providing legal advice to non-clients. Those rules are broadly applied to law firms, and certainly would apply to lawyers’ actions on a podcast.

Is that a reason not to have a podcast? Not really. I mean, you have a website, right? And, you send emails, do you not? How do you protect yourself in those instances?

That’s right: the handy dandy disclaimer!

The good news is that you can protect yourself from podcasting by using this same strategy.

You can include disclaimers in your podcast feed description, or on any website where you host your show. That’s pretty straightforward, and very similar to what you would do with your law firm website or social media channels. True, there isn’t a 1:1 comparison for audio or video attributes; though, I think we can make it work.

Simply read a disclaimer that indicates listening to or watching the podcast does not create an attorney-client relationship and that the podcast is produced and published for informational or entertainment purposes only and does not represent legal advice. Read and record the disclaimer once, and insert it in the final recording of your podcast. Or, record a new disclaimer version for each episode, and maybe add a humorous spin (e.g., “If you want advice: ask my mother-in-law!”).  Add it to the show notes too.

Bonus coverage: Once you’re capturing various formats when you record a show, note that the disclaimer will make it into your show transcript as well.

He Said, She Said: The Guest Conundrum

Of course, most podcasts feature regular guests — and those guests could literally say anything. If some of your guests are active lawyers as well, it makes sense to discuss how they’d like to approach ethics issues before the show starts. For guests who are not practicing lawyers, it makes sense to provide them with some information about your ethical requirements. You don’t want them asking you for your legal advice during the conversation!

Now, the expectation is not that your guests will be reading through your jurisdiction’s ethics rules in advance of a show appearance. Trust me, you’d never have any guests on your show if that were the case. But you could offer some high points as part of your pre-show guidance for guests. This is certainly a broader consideration – but you should send to your guests pre-show guidance about what to expect in general, via email, at a safe remove from the recording date. That’ll cover a whole host of things, but should include some information about lawyer ethics.

Obviously, avoid conversations about active cases or discoverable matters.

Plus, keep in mind that podcasts are generally pre-recorded. So, if one of your guests (or you!) gets a little out of pocket, episodes can be edited (most likely) or re-recorded (less likely) before release. You’re in control (or your producer is)!

Border Patrol: The Multi-Jurisdictional Dilemma

Here’s another brain-twister for you: The internet is everywhere, so if you broadcast a podcast from your office in Chicago, someone in Timbuktu — or, more concerningly, Wisconsin — could be listening. Are you practicing law in a jurisdiction where you aren’t licensed just because they downloaded your episode?

Relax, Chicken Little.

While the ABA Model Rules on multi-jurisdictional practice (specifically Rule 5.5) are always hovering like a raincloud, navigating legal ethics and podcasting across state lines is relatively painless. Again, your disclaimer does the heavy lifting. Simply state where you are licensed to practice law right at the top of the show and in show notes. You don’t need a passport to host a podcast, just a little geographical transparency.

Proper Planning Prevents Poor Performance: Your Script Is Your Friend

That level of control also extends to your personal preparation for the podcast. As just alluded to, professional podcasts are edited and revised before publication, and most podcast hosts build scripts as guideposts for shows, which can be shared with guests. Generally speaking, if you stick to the script, with appropriate ethical guardrails in place, you’ll stay in your lane.

Keeping it tight also means that you should speak only from your experience — bluster does not serve the lawyer or lawyer-podcaster; it’s another way for you to get in trouble, potentially, from an ethics standpoint. Calling yourself the “best” attorney (unprovable) or comparing yourself to another attorney is just inviting an ethics complaint — especially when you’re doing it in a format as public as a podcast.

Lots of referral sources and potential clients are interested in your actual experience and demonstrated domain authority. Not only is it against the lawyers’ ethics canon to say false or misleading things, but it also doesn’t serve a viable marketing purpose.

Podcasting like a pro means preparing for your episodes and ensuring that your guests are aware of your process, as well as your obligations as an attorney.

That may not seem like tons of fun, but even race car drivers wear seatbelts (and diapers).


Let’s be clear: a disclaimer isn’t an impenetrable magic wand, but it is the strongest shield you’ve got. Much like the footers on your firm’s website or your ethical e-newsletters, a clear, upfront audio disclaimer establishes the terms of engagement. It formally puts the listener on notice that your content is educational, not prescriptive. Don’t bury it at the end of the episode; put it right at the top so there is absolutely no ambiguity.

Podcasts don’t stop at the state line. If you’re broadcasting to the internet, you’re inevitably reaching folks in jurisdictions where you aren’t licensed to practice. The key here is specificity and transparency. In your intro or your standard disclaimer, politely but firmly state the specific states where you are licensed. This prevents out-of-state listeners from reasonably assuming you are offering counsel tailored to their local laws.

You’re the host, which means it’s your house and your rules. While you aren’t strictly liable for every stray thought that pops out of a guest’s mouth, you are responsible for the marketing content your firm publishes. If a guest crosses the line into unauthorized practice of law or makes wildly inaccurate claims, use your editorial power. Remember, podcasts are recorded. You have the ultimate luxury of the “edit” button. Cut the segment or record a clarifying voiceover before the episode goes live.

We all know that “ripped from the headlines” content drives clicks and downloads, but discussing active cases—especially your own—is a fast track to an ethics headache. Commenting on your own ongoing litigation risks violating rules around trial publicity and confidentiality. Even commenting on other high-profile cases can be risky if it creates a conflict of interest with your current clients. Stick to the settled law, public records, overarching legal principles or the mechanics of how the system works rather than playing armchair judge on active dockets.

share TWEET PIN IT share share
Jared Correia Jared Correia

Jared D. Correia is CEO of Red Cave Law Firm Consulting, which offers subscription-based law firm business management consulting services, and works with legal vendors to develop programming and content. An attorney and legal tech expert, Jared is the host of Legal Late Night podcast and speaks frequently at industry events. In addition to writing on Managing, he is the host of the Above the Law  Non-Eventcast, the featured podcast of the Above the Law Non-Event for Tech-Perplexed Lawyers.

More Posts By This Author
MUST READ Articles for Law Firms Click to expand
envelope

Welcome to Attorney at Work!

       

Sign up for our free newsletter.

x

All fields are required. By signing up, you are opting in to Attorney at Work's free practice tips newsletter and occasional emails with news and offers. By using this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understand our Privacy Policy.