Get to the Point!

Happy National Grammar Day! Lawyers’ Top Three Grammar Goof-ups

By | Mar.04.14 | Communicating, Daily Dispatch, Get to the Point, Law Practice

Man with index finger pointed up Get to the Point

It’s a fitting way to celebrate National Grammar Day: Today we are announcing that lawyer and author Teddy Snyder is taking over Attorney at Work’s monthly “Get to the Point” column. Teddy will be giving practical tips, picking at nits and — we’re certain — offering an occasional rant aimed at helping us all communicate more effectively and confidently. 

Yes, believe it or not, it is national Grammar Day, the day for us to celebrate the value of effective communication. A day to rejoice that lawyers especially are wordsmiths who delight in precise oral and written communication.

Okay, you’re right, I was just joking about that last part. But it’s true that it’s National Grammar Day. You can even sing along with the anthem on YouTube.

Three Irritating Grammar Gaffes

In honor of National Grammar Day, here are the top three grammar and usage missteps I see made by lawyers (and pretty much everybody else).

1. Saying “I” instead of “me” all the time doesn’t make you sound smart or cultured. I previously wrote about this for Attorney At Work in “Sloppy Writing Sucks.” The “I or me” question usually comes up when there is a prepositional phrase (did I lose you yet?) with multiple people being referenced and ending with what should be “me.” The easy way to test for this is to remove the other names and see how it looks:

Please explain it to Merrilyn and me.  (You wouldn’t say “Please explain it to I.”)

The technical explanation? “I” is the correct first-person singular pronoun (groan here) only as the subject in the sentence or clause, i.e., when “I” am doing the being or acting of the sentence:

Merrilyn and I will explain it to you.

2. There is no such word as “alot.” I had a hard time keystroking this, because spell-check automatically wanted to change it, but I still see it all the time. Once spell-check fixes it, are people going back and changing it to be wrong? “A lot” — meaning “a great many” — refers to an allotment of something. Sorry, no such word as “alot.”

3. An acronym is a special kind of abbreviation that can be pronounced as a word. The well-known organization PETA is known by its acronym. NAACP is not. If the American Bar Association were a Scandinavian singing group, it would be known by its acronym. Alas, it is called the A-B-A. I hear the term “acronym” used for all manner of abbreviations, and once as a synonym for “word.” (Though that was by a human resources person, so maybe it doesn’t count.)

Perhaps you think I am picking at nits. Yet there is a contingent of people in the world who believe the accurate use of language is indispensable to human communication, not to mention the practice of any profession relying on such a skill, like, uh, law.

Theda C. “Teddy” Snyder mediates workers’ compensation cases throughout California. An attorney since 1977, she has practiced in a variety of settings and is a frequent speaker and author on topics impacting settlement and the business of law. She is a Fellow of the College of Law Practice Management. Based in Los Angeles, Teddy can be found at www.WCMediator.com.

Bonus for National Grammar Day:

Teddy’s most popular Attorney at Work post to date is a marketing classic: Feature versus Benefit.

Illustration ©ImageZoo.

Sponsored Links

Recommended Reading

6 Responses to “Happy National Grammar Day! Lawyers’ Top Three Grammar Goof-ups”

  1. Debra L Bruce
    4 March 2014 at 8:47 am #

    When you get to grammar rants, I hope you’ll include “her and I” as in “Her and I bought a new truck.” Maybe it’s excusable if you grew up in the backwoods and only got through the 8th grade. It’s not excusable for lawyers. I haven’t seen it in writing, but I’m shocked to say that I hear it!

  2. Teddy Snyder
    4 March 2014 at 3:03 pm #

    Thanks, Pat, for the info on initialisms. I think “abbreviation” works for everyone- and doesn’t rub anyone the wrong way. If you are dealing with a kind of abbreviation, it’s still an abbreviation. It’s the pervasive incorrect use of “acronym” that seems to have penetrated corporate-speak.

  3. Bob Ambrogi
    4 March 2014 at 5:13 pm #

    Just to pick a couple more nits, I would argue that two of these are not grammar mistakes. The second item is a spelling mistake and the third is a definition mistake. But perhaps you cover yourself by describing these as “grammar and usage missteps.”

    Also, the third item is not a mistake according to at least two dictionaries. Both Merriam-Webster and Webster’s Unabridged would include an abbreviation formed from initial letters, such as FBI, within the definition of acronym.

  4. Mary Lewis
    12 March 2014 at 6:46 am #

    Love it!


Comment