If you pour more money into law firm lead generation without plugging the holes in your leaky intake and conversion process, you aren’t marketing —you’re just burning cash.
When a law firm’s advertising isn’t working, their first instinct is largely the same: we need more leads. More budget. More campaigns. More clicks. More forms filled out. If we just crank up the volume, the cases will follow.
I’ve audited over 600 personal injury law firm ad accounts. Here’s what I’ve learned about law firm lead generation.
Table of contents
Firms That Are Struggling Rarely Have a Lead Generation Problem
They have a lead conversion problem. Or a tracking problem. Or an intake problem. But almost never a “not enough leads” problem.
Pouring more water into a leaky bucket doesn’t fill it faster. You have to fix the holes first.
Here are the three places those holes usually hide.
1. You’re Counting Leads, Not Cases
Your marketing team reports that leads are up 30% this month. Great news, right?
Not necessarily. A lead is someone who filled out a form or picked up the phone. A case is someone who signed a retainer. The gap between those two numbers is where most law firm ad budgets go to die.
I worked with a Philadelphia personal injury firm that was spending aggressively on Google ads. Their reports showed strong lead volume. The agency was thrilled.
But when we rebuilt their tracking to follow leads all the way to signed cases, we discovered that the campaign was producing almost zero actual business. The targeting was off. They were paying for a flood of leads that would never convert.
They didn’t need more leads. They needed to stop paying for bad ones.
Once they reallocated budget to campaigns that were quietly producing real cases, they tripled their caseload. Same total spend. Completely different results.
The fix is simple: Stop celebrating leads and start tracking signed cases.
Six numbers tell you everything you need to know:
- Ad spend
- Total leads (calls, forms, chats — deduplicated)
- Qualified leads (people who fit your criteria)
- Signed cases
- Cost per lead
- Cost per case
That last number is the only one that actually matters. If your agency can’t produce it, you’re flying blind.
2. You Can’t See Which Leads Actually Convert
Here’s a question about their law firm lead generation that stops most firms cold:
Which campaign drove your best cases last month?
Not leads. Cases. The ones that actually signed and will generate revenue.
Most firms can’t answer that.
They have Google Analytics. They have call tracking. They get monthly reports with colorful charts. But nothing is connected. There’s no way to trace a signed case back to the ad click that started it.
Without that connection, you’re making budget decisions based on vibes.
- You might be pouring money into a campaign that generates lots of activity but zero revenue.
- You might be underfunding the one channel that’s quietly producing most of your signed cases.
I see this constantly: a firm has 60% of its budget in one channel and 60% of its signed cases coming from another. They had no idea because the tracking was never set up to show them.
More leads won’t help here. You could double your lead volume and still have no idea what’s working. The problem isn’t volume. It’s information. It’s visibility.
The technical fix is called closed-loop attribution: connecting your ad platforms to your CRM so you can trace the full journey from click to signed case. It requires some setup: UTM parameters, offline conversion tracking, and CRM configuration.
But the concept is simple. You should be able to pull a report that shows which campaigns produced revenue, not just activity.
Until you can see what’s actually working, spending more is just guessing louder.
3. Your Leads Are Converting (But Just Not With You!)
This is the pattern nobody wants to talk about, because it means the ads might be working fine. Your campaigns generate leads. Real leads. People who need a lawyer and are ready to hire one. They call your office or fill out your form.
And then … nothing.
They reach voicemail during business hours. They don’t get a callback for 48 hours. The intake person doesn’t ask the right questions. They get frustrated and call the next firm on their list.
Your competitor thanks you for warming them up.
I’ve seen PI firms double their ad spend trying to fix a “lead generation problem” that was actually an intake problem. They didn’t need more leads. They needed to stop losing the leads they already had.
The math is brutal. If your intake converts 20% of qualified leads to signed cases, and your competitor converts 40%, they can pay twice as much per lead and still come out ahead. You’re not competing on advertising. You’re competing on operations.
Before you ask for more leads, answer these questions:
- How fast do you respond to new inquiries?
- What percentage of calls go to voicemail?
- What’s your conversion rate from qualified lead to signed case?
If you don’t know these numbers, find out. If the numbers are bad, fix intake before you spend another dollar on advertising.
More leads will just give you more people to disappoint.
(Read Karen and David Skinner’s article, Law Firm Intake: Save Time and Convert More Clients With These 3 Law Firm Intake Tips.)
Final Thoughts on The Real Fix for Your Marketing
Here’s what I tell every firm I work with: more leads feel like progress. They show up in reports. They make dashboards look good. But if your tracking is broken, your attribution is blind, and your intake is leaking, more leads are just more expensive proof that something else is wrong.
Fix the holes first. Then turn up the volume.
Image © iStockPhoto.com.
Sign up for Attorney at Work’s daily practice tips newsletter here and subscribe to our podcast, Attorney at Work Today.
