Lawlytics
share TWEET PIN IT share share 0

The Friday Five

What Does the Future Hold for Lawyers?

By Steve Nelson

Some of the legal profession’s foremost thought leaders gathered last week at the College of Law Practice Management’s 2013 Futures Conference, October 4-5, in Chicago. This year, a new format combined brief TED-style talks with longer breakout sessions on three topics: “The Market for Legal Services from the Buyer’s Point of View,” “Innovation in the Law Firm” and “The Future of U.S. Law Schools.”

Here are some of the things I learned.

1. In the future, many important aspects of legal representation will not be handled by lawyers, but by others possessing specific skills that will provide value to clients. One challenge is ensuring that these other professionals are treated as equals by lawyers. Indeed, the term “nonlawyers,” often used to describe these professionals, is increasingly becoming viewed as a slur.

2. Lawyers will need to understand and address the tectonic shifts occurring in our society, particularly in the areas of food and water, energy and technology. As a result, lawyers must continue to become knowledgeable about the industries they serve and the significant challenges that these industries face.

3. While innovation in law firms must be supported and often instigated at the top, the key constituency that will decide whether such innovations are successful will be at the practice group level — because that’s where real decisions to provide value to clients occur.

4. While innovation has been and will continue to be driven from outside big law firms by market disruptors, it would be folly to underestimate what larger law firms are doing. As one participant noted, “Many of these firms are innovating. They’re just not talking about it.”

5. Law schools will have to adapt to the reality that far fewer graduates will enter law firms as traditional associates. Instead, legal educators will have to provide different tracks for lawyers who have a variety of career options and provide relevant training (not just case law) for those students. Moreover, law schools may need to consider instituting relevant programs for those who are not interested in a law degree, but who will be key service providers in solving legal problems. (Just don’t call them nonlawyers!)

 

Categories: Friday Five, Innovation
Originally published October 11, 2013
Last updated February 23, 2021
share TWEET PIN IT share share
Steve Nelson

Steve Nelson is an executive principal at The McCormick Group, an executive search firm based in Arlington, Va. Steve conducts partner-level searches, searches for in-house counsel, and searches for administrative professionals for law firms. In addition, he serves as a consultant for law firm merger planning, practice area expansion, and in recruiting strategy. Steve is a former attorney with 17 years in legal journalism and publishing and is a Fellow of the College of Law Practice Management. Follow him @SKNLegal.

More Posts By This Author
envelope

Welcome to Attorney at Work!

Sign up for our free newsletter.

x

All fields are required. By signing up, you are opting in to Attorney at Work's free practice tips newsletter and occasional emails with news and offers. By using this service, you indicate that you agree to our Terms and Conditions and have read and understand our Privacy Policy.