Sign up for our free newsletter.
It’s hard to believe, but this is our 25th annual report on what’s going on in the legal profession. Like all previous reports, it is based on information we compile throughout the year, not just from clients but also from many other sources, including surveys, discussions with firms’ management and other leaders in the profession. Much has changed, of course, particularly in the last five years. As always, some of our findings are obvious, but they must be reported because they may have unexpected consequences. Others are little noticed, but we feel they may be significant now or in the future. What is most important to recognize is that, more than ever before, the outlook for each firm will vary depending on its size, practice areas, strategic focus and geographic market(s). The resulting picture is a montage of a profession that is in a state of flux and will continue to be so, not just in 2014 but for years to come.
Non-lawyer competition. Several developments indicate that non-lawyers may become a larger factor in providing legal services. The Washington State Supreme Court has approved a rule creating non-lawyer legal technicians. The New York State Bar has recommended going ahead with a pilot program to permit trained non-lawyer advocates to provide out-of-court assistance in specific areas to low-income New Yorkers. In California, the State Board of Trustees has expressed interest in a limited-practice licensing program. In August, the ABA said it was softening its position on fee sharing with non-lawyers. Add these developments to the ongoing litigation on whether firms can have non-lawyer owners (which we discussed in last year’s report) and it appears non-lawyers will have a strong impact on the profession.
Non-lawyers to have a voice in the profession? Professor James Moliterno of the Washington and Lee School of Law suggests letting non-lawyers serve in leadership and policy positions in the ABA and also state bar associations. He wrote, “Turning to creative non-lawyers presents the most advantageous way for the legal profession to grow and change on its own terms.”
GC compensation. A new survey just released by Equilar Inc. reports that median total compensation for general counsels at Fortune 1000 companies has jumped almost 5% from last year. The reasons? Corporations’ profits are rising even as they face a host of new regulations as well as other legal challenges, and chief legal officers are being given broader responsibilities that require business as well as legal acumen.
Divorce is getting easier thanks to technology. Wevorce, a start-up online service, has run a pilot program that separates the process into discrete steps that are easily managed without getting into a court battle. And Philadelphia-based Fox Rothschild has launched a New Jersey divorce app designed to provide resources and tools for the various stages of the divorce process.
Merger mania. Although talks involving two major mergers were called off right before Thanksgiving, the number of completed mergers has shot up this year and more are under consideration as we write this report. Some have resulted in even larger international firms, while others have mostly involved larger or midsize U.S. firms acquiring — and that is the proper word — much smaller firms. However, historically half the mergers fail and should not have occurred, as discussed in our November Legal Communique, “Pay Attention to the Red Flags.” Furthermore, some top legal officers at Fortune 100 companies say this merger mania doesn’t impress them. One example: IBM General Counsel Robert Weber said, “I’m pretty skeptical about the value these big mergers give to clients.”
Virtual law firms. The trend continues. But what is a “virtual law firm” and are they here to stay? Chad Burton discusses the issues in his recent piece in Attorney at Work. His conclusion may surprise you.
Malpractice claims. Although there are no definite figures yet for this year, according to seven major insurers the number of law firm malpractice claims increased last year as angry clients filed suits over conflicts of interest and other alleged missteps.
Smaller firms getting a bigger piece of the pie. As noted twice above under Practice Areas, midsize and small firms are receiving more work that used to go to big-name firms. According to the Wall Street Journal, midsize firms are now getting 41% of the big-ticket litigation. Three years ago they only got 22 percent. The reasons? (1) Many smaller firms have partners and associates who were trained at the country’s biggest firms and then left; (2) their rates are lower; and (3) lawyers at these firms are more attentive to their clients’ needs and desires than those at the large firms are.
Hourly rates. Many firms, particularly the largest ones, have raised their rates — again! But that’s not the whole picture. You have to look beyond the standard rates. Except for “bet the company work,” these firms are then offering widespread discounts and write-offs which result in lower realization. In fact, as we reported in our Mid-Year Update, full realization — the percentage of collections compared to the dollar value of billable time (DVBT) — has continued to decline. Another factor contributing to lower realization is the increase in aged accounts receivable as clients take longer to pay and contest firms’ charges.
Seeking new paths for young lawyers. The New York City Bar Association is exploring some alternatives for young lawyers who are not getting hired after graduation. One is to place them in apprenticeships with large banks and other employers. Another is to start up a law firm where young lawyers could gain experience — and hopefully earn a decent living — by helping people and small businesses that can’t afford market-rate legal fees. Cisco Systems is exploring a similar route. It plans to team up with the University of Colorado Law School on a program in which students will be paid to work full time in the company’s legal department while taking extra classes to make up for missed coursework. The goal of Cisco’s GC is to develop a number of companies and firms that will take two or three students a year on this basis.
B Corps. This is a new legal category of company, created by B Lab in Wayne, Pa., that expands its fiduciary responsibility, not just to its shareholders, but also to other stakeholders such as employees, neighbors and the environment. Nineteen states and the District of Columbia have passed B Corp legislation and 850 companies now carry the B Corp certification.
Questions raised about litigation funding. As we reported in our Mid-Year Update, “a new wave of investors are funding lawsuits in hopes of collecting when verdicts come down.” And Kent Gardiner, chairman of Crowell Morning, stated, “I think you would find a notable percentage of the Fortune 100 have engaged in some kind of funded litigation.” But Baker Bott’s Lisa Thomas wrote that the communications necessary for litigation funding groups to perform their due diligence on the merits of the case raise discoverability issues for eventual litigation. Another concern by critics is that third-party investors will exert undue control over legal decisions and that the practice will drive up the overall cost of litigation.
Legal project management (LPM). No question that it is necessary, but a growing number of COOs continue to state that the process gets more attention than the results.
Non-JD programs. Enrollment has increased 13% in the last three years. Why? They are attracting people such as doctors and environmental consultants, who do not intend to practice law but feel they need grounding in legal basics.
Pro bono. Despite the reports that show a drop in the number of pro bono hours in the last few years, to paraphrase Mark Twain, “the reports of its death are greatly exaggerated.” There are many examples in addition to New York State increasing the voluntary goal for lawyers to 50 hours a year from 20. Steve Taylor addressed the subject in the November Of Counsel, and included examples such as the IMPACT project, launched by the Association of Pro Bono Counsel, and the programs of several major law firms to provide non-litigation pro bono opportunities. Steve concludes by stating, “One thing that’s certain is that the young generation of lawyers has as much, or perhaps more, interest in performing free legal work and giving to their communities as their older colleagues” and that “law school graduates are attracted to firms that have successful pro bono programs.”
For-profit law schools. A private-equity firm launched Infilaw in 2004, shortly after buying the Florida Coastal School of Law in Jacksonville. Infilaw then launched two other for-profit schools, the Phoenix School of Law in Arizona and the Charlotte School of Law in North Carolina. The schools have had no trouble getting students but, judged by other metrics, they have been less successful. Graduates’ bar-passage rates have generally been below state averages and so have job-placement rates. Now Infilaw is trying to buy Charleston School of Law in South Carolina, but is running into opposition from alumni and even students. Plus the company is now faced with two recent federal lawsuits.
Entry-level hiring. Midsize and smaller firms continue to benefit from the availability of qualified laterals who either have been pushed out of large firms or leave of their own choice. However, some of the midsize firms continue to hire young lawyers as opposed to laterals because, as one managing partner put it, “There’s a deep talent pool and it’s a buyer’s market.”
Succession planning. This continues to be one of the hottest and most important issues. Small and midsize firms are now recognizing this too. It involves much more than transitioning clients. Many factors must also be addressed, including retirement funding, mandatory retirement, firm infrastructure, compensation and grooming future firm and practice leaders.
Alternative fee arrangements. No report would be complete without discussing them! While many clients exert pressure for something other than hourly fees, what they are really seeking is transparency: What will the total legal bill amount to? Fixed fees are obviously one approach but so are hourly fees with a cap or a base fee with a bonus or “kicker” based on results. In other words, the billable hour is not dead.
Much better than the pessimistic pundits are predicting. Between retirements and reduced hiring of law school graduates, the oversupply of lawyers will work its way down. But if you look at the total market for legal services and not just the number of lawyers, there will be further growth as new laws and regulations are passed and more non-lawyers and entities exist to provide them.
Bob Denney is President of Robert Denney Associates, Inc., which provides strategic management and marketing counsel to law firms, companies and nonprofit organizations throughout the United States.
Get really good ideas every day: Subscribe to the Daily Dispatch and Weekly Wrap (it’s free). Follow us on Twitter @attnyatwork. Illustration ©iStockImages.com
Sign up for our free newsletter.
Marketers of anything who fail to learn prospective buyers’ motivation are doomed to fail.October 17, 2018 0 7 0