Is it unethical for someone else to write your blog posts? Is it misleading? Is it fraudulent or a misrepresentation? Do ghostwritten blogs come with risks? When you have back and forth with readers of your blog or on other social media, do you risk creating an attorney-client relationship?
This is the second of two posts looking at the ethics of blogging and otherwise communicating through social media platforms. (Be sure to read “Blogging, Posting and Ethics — Oh, My! Part 1.”) Here we explore ghostwriting and the risk of creating an attorney-client relationship.
Ghostwriting: Two Issues
Before the internet was a thing, a small industry produced lawyer newsletters. These newsletters consisted of a handful of short articles about legal matters, e.g. “Is it time to update your will?” (probably is) or “Can I sell my house without a lawyer?” (only a fool would do that!). Sometimes the newsletters had space for a customized article by the lawyer, while they always included the sponsoring lawyer’s contact information. Fast-forward to the 21st century and this industry has gone digital, with emailed newsletters, bulletins and alerts, in addition to ghostwritten blog posts.
This type of ghostwriting raises two ethics issues:
- First, is the blog or post an advertisement and therefore subject to the rules governing ads?
- Second, is the ghostwriting misconduct because it is a misrepresentation?
The question of whether a blog is an advertisement was explored in Part 1, here, with the conclusion that “it depends.” Note that in Hunter v. Virginia State Bar, the court determined the lawyer’s blog to be an advertisement in part because it was a section of his website and reported mostly on the successful outcome of his own cases.
California Formal Opinion 2016-196 further explores this issue. It makes four conclusions:
- A blog may be an advertisement if it explicitly or implicitly offers the lawyer’s services.
- A blog that is integrated into the firm’s website is an advertisement to the same extent as the site itself.
- A “stand-alone” blog is not subject to the rules unless it directly or implicitly “expresses the attorney’s availability for … employment.”
- A stand-alone blog that discusses non-legal issues is not subject to the rules unless it includes “extensive and/or detailed professional identification announcing the attorney’s availability.”
Assuming a blog is an advertisement and subject to the rules, the question then becomes whether the ghostwriting is a violation of those rules. ABA Model Rule 7.1, which has been adopted in part by every state, states that a lawyer shall not “make a false or misleading communication about the lawyer or the lawyer’s services.” Nothing in the rule or its comment suggests it would apply to a lawyer engaging someone to ghostwrite blog posts. However, it is not unimaginable to conclude that a lawyer who posts a ghostwritten blog under the lawyer’s byline and about the lawyer’s services would be subject to this rule.
Beyond the “false or misleading” prohibition of Rule 7.1, ABA Model Rule 8.4, again adopted by virtually every state, prohibits misconduct. According to this rule, it is professional misconduct for a lawyer to “engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation.” Again, neither the rule nor its comment address conduct remotely connected to ghostwriting a blog. The comment focuses on a lawyer’s illegal behavior, with a tone toward conduct that is far more serious than ghostwriting. Nevertheless, lawyers should not entirely dismiss the possibility that ghostwritten blogging could be considered conduct involving “misrepresentation.”
Forming the Attorney-Client Relationship
Finally, we turn to the question of whether a lawyer is at risk of inadvertently forming an attorney-client relationship when blogging or posting on various social media platforms. While there are extensive articles about the creation of that attorney-client relationship, let’s boil it down to simple terms. Generally, an attorney-client relationship is formed when the potential client believes there is that relationship and there is a reasonable basis for that belief.
So, it is in the eye of the beholder. It is, therefore, incumbent on the lawyer to make certain there is no reasonable basis for the potential client to embrace the belief there is a relationship. Blog posts ordinarily should not give someone the impression they are providing legal advice to a specific viewer. However, there are possible exceptions, where, for example, a lawyer blogs about a specific question previously submitted by a viewer, or when the blog or any social media platform enables the lawyer to have an exchange with viewers.
Does that exchange pivot from the generic to specific advice to the extent it is possible a potential client will come to the conclusion the advice forms the relationship?
A Summary of Ethics Considerations for Attorney Blogs
- Try to avoid a blog or communication that could be considered an advertisement.
- Avoid content that explicitly or implicitly advances the lawyer’s services.
- Have a stand-alone site for the blog. Do not connect the blog to a firm website that is promoting the lawyer’s services.
- Regardless of the content of the post, avoid extensive or detailed information about the lawyer’s availability to provide legal services.
- If the blog is an advertisement, make sure to follow the state’s “ad rules.”
- Avoid any confidential information about clients, past or present.
- This includes information about the representation for current clients and information that is not otherwise widely known about past matters.
- Understand that anonymizing the information does not permit you to use it.
- However, you may blog about confidential information if the client gives informed consent for you to do so.
- Lawyers who use ghostwritten blogs should consider:
- Whether they may be considered advertisements, and comply with the ad rules if they are.
- Avoiding a situation where the conduct of using a ghostwriter could be considered a misrepresentation.
- Lawyers who blog or post on social media should avoid the risk of creating an attorney-client relationship.
- Avoid posts or comments that refer to a specific individual or a specific fact-based circumstance.
- Include a clear and conspicuous disclaimer that no attorney-client relationship is formed until there is a formal agreement to do so.
- The disclaimer should make it unreasonable for a potential client to believe the lawyer is their lawyer.
You Might Also Like …
“Attorney Advertising: The Errors of Your Omissions” by Will Hornsby
“Shiny New Social Media Syndrome for Lawyers” by Megan Zavieh
“Ethics of Virtual Consultations” by Megan Zavieh
“The Ethics of the Pivot” by Will Hornsby
Subscribe to Attorney at Work
Get really good ideas every day for your law practice: Subscribe to the Daily Dispatch (it’s free). Follow us on Twitter @attnyatwork.